Mandalika's scratchpad | [ Work blog @Oracle | My Music Compositions ] |
Old Posts: 09.04 10.04 11.04 12.04 01.05 02.05 03.05 04.05 05.05 06.05 07.05 08.05 09.05 10.05 11.05 12.05 01.06 02.06 03.06 04.06 05.06 06.06 07.06 08.06 09.06 10.06 11.06 12.06 01.07 02.07 03.07 04.07 05.07 06.07 08.07 09.07 10.07 11.07 12.07 01.08 02.08 03.08 04.08 05.08 06.08 07.08 08.08 09.08 10.08 11.08 12.08 01.09 02.09 03.09 04.09 05.09 06.09 07.09 08.09 09.09 10.09 11.09 12.09 01.10 02.10 03.10 04.10 05.10 06.10 07.10 08.10 09.10 10.10 11.10 12.10 01.11 02.11 03.11 04.11 05.11 07.11 08.11 09.11 10.11 11.11 12.11 01.12 02.12 03.12 04.12 05.12 06.12 07.12 08.12 09.12 10.12 11.12 12.12 01.13 02.13 03.13 04.13 05.13 06.13 07.13 08.13 09.13 10.13 11.13 12.13 01.14 02.14 03.14 04.14 05.14 06.14 07.14 09.14 10.14 11.14 12.14 01.15 02.15 03.15 04.15 06.15 09.15 12.15 01.16 03.16 04.16 05.16 06.16 07.16 08.16 09.16 12.16 01.17 02.17 03.17 04.17 06.17 07.17 08.17 09.17 10.17 12.17 01.18 02.18 03.18 04.18 05.18 06.18 07.18 08.18 09.18 11.18 12.18 01.19 02.19 05.19 06.19 08.19 10.19 11.19 05.20 10.20 11.20 12.20 09.21 11.21 12.22
Hardly six months after announcing Siebel 8.1.1.4 benchmark results on Oracle SPARC T4 servers, we have a brand new set of Siebel 8.1.1.4 benchmark results on Oracle SPARC T5 servers. There are no updates to the Siebel benchmark kit in the last couple years - so, we continued to use the Siebel 8.1.1.4 benchmark workload to measure the performance of Siebel Financial Services Call Center and Order Management business transactions on the recently announced SPARC T5 servers.
Benchmark Details
The latest Siebel 8.1.1.4 benchmark was executed on a mix of SPARC T5-2, SPARC T4-2 and SPARC T4-1 servers. The benchmark test simulated the actions of a large corporation with 40,000 concurrent active users. To date, this is the highest user count we achieved in a Siebel benchmark.
User Load Breakdown & Achieved Throughput
Siebel Application Module | %Total Load | #Users | Business Trx per Hour |
---|---|---|---|
Financial Services Call Center | 70 | 28,000 | 273,786 |
Order Management | 30 | 12,000 | 59,553 |
Total | 100 | 40,000 | 333,339 |
Average Transaction Response Times for both Financial Services Call Center and Order Management transactions were under one second.
Software & Hardware Specification
Test Component | Software | Version | Server Model | Server Qty | Per Server Specification | OS | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chips | Cores | vCPUs | CPU Speed | CPU Type | Memory | ||||||
Application Server | Siebel | 8.1.1.4 | SPARC T5-2 | 2 | 2 | 32 | 256 | 3.6 GHz | SPARC-T5 | 512 GB | Solaris 10 1/13 (S10U11) |
Database Server | Oracle 11g R2 | 11.2.0.2 | SPARC T4-2 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 128 | 2.85 GHz | SPARC-T4 | 256 GB | Solaris 10 8/11 (S10U10) |
Web Server | iPlanet Web Server | 7.0.9 (7 U9) | SPARC T4-1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 64 | 2.85 GHz | SPARC-T4 | 128 GB | Solaris 10 8/11 (S10U10) |
Load Generator | Oracle Application Test Suite | 9.21.0043 | SunFire X4200 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 2.6 GHz | AMD Opteron 285 SE | 16 GB | Windows 2003 R2 SP2 |
Load Drivers (Agents) | Oracle Application Test Suite | 9.21.0043 | SunFire X4170 | 8 | 2 | 12 | 12 | 2.93 GHz | Intel Xeon X5670 | 48 GB | Windows 2003 R2 SP2 |
Additional Notes:
Resource Utilization
Component | #Users | CPU% | Memory Footprint |
---|---|---|---|
Gateway/Application Server | 20,000 | 67.03 | 205.54 GB |
Application Server | 20,000 | 66.09 | 206.24 GB |
Database Server | 40,000 | 33.43 | 108.72 GB |
Web Server | 40,000 | 29.48 | 14.03 GB |
Finally, how does this benchmark stack up against other published benchmarks? Short answer is "very well". Head over to the Oracle Siebel Benchmark White Papers webpage to do the comparison yourself.
[Credit to our hard working colleagues in SAE, Siebel PSR, benchmark and Oracle Platform Integration (OPI) teams. Special thanks to Sumti Jairath and Venkat Krishnaswamy for the last minute fire drill]
Labels: Oracle Siebel Sun SPARC T5 Benchmark T5-2
2004-2019 |